How were smaller kingdoms in Southeast Asia and the Americas affected by trade and migration patterns of larger global empires? What environmental factors impeded interaction?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers will vary but correct responses should include: The Americas and Southeast Asia were relatively isolated from the trade and migration patterns of the larger global empires, and focused on internal trade, agricultural development, and state building. In the Americas, they were bounded by vast oceans, the Atlantic and Pacific; and most rivers flow east–west, preventing north–south contacts. In Southwest Asia, they were focused on internal development as many maritime cities turned their focus inward toward agricultural development. The Pacific Island kingdoms, while proficient in maritime trade, did not extend their reach toward the global empires, despite their strong navigational technology. While environmental factors did impede interaction, the inward focus of these regions in developing their civilizations and conquering their own environments kept them from being affected from the larger global empires.
You might also like to view...
The Caroline incident involved a controversy over
A) the United States-Canadian boundary from Lake Superior to the Lake of the Woods. B) the use of United States ships to enforce the ban on the Atlantic slave trade. C) American's harboring Canadian rebels. D) Maine's boundary with Canada.
The Battle of New Orleans was significant because it __________.
a) secured the Mississippi River as a trade route for American settlers in the West b) strengthened the British–Native American alliance forged during the War of 1812 c) opened the door for the British to occupy New Orleans and control trade in the region d) pressured the United States to sign the peace treaty being negotiated in Europe
Which English monarch was married to Philip II?
What will be an ideal response?
Who defeated and then abolished the Janissary corps?