For situations that appear to be mutually combative, the police officer can look for three elements of self-defense that may be helpful in the primary aggressor determination. Explain
What will be an ideal response?
The police officer may ask these three questions to help determine the primary aggressor when mutual combat appears to have occurred:
Did one person using force have a reasonable belief the he or she was at risk of bodily harm? The risk is reasonable if based on prior incidents, where a recent escalation in violence has occurred, a specific threat was made to the self-defender that caused the defense posture.
Was the risk of harm was actual or imminent?
Was the force used reasonably necessary to prevent or stop the infliction of bodily harm? For example, a person small in stature may use a weapon to prevent the abuser from inflicting bodily harm.
You might also like to view...
The model used to investigate and forensically analyze evidence for physical crimes should also be used for virtual crimes
a. True b. False
Discuss the development of the concept of a super-predator class of adolescent offender. What lead to the development of this new class of offender? Were the predictions about the super-predators justified? How did the concept of a super-predator class of youthful offender impact juvenile justice systems in the United States.?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following refers to the legitimate source of criminal law?
A. specificity B. regularity C. uniformity D. politicality
Which of the following is an example of procedural law?
A) The law that defines the crime of first degree and specifies the appropriate punishment B) A vehicle regulation law C) A law that specifies when a search warrant may be issued to the police D) A law that places restrictions on how a corporation may dispose of hazardous waste