What tests do courts use to determine whether or not an antitrust violation has occurred?
What will be an ideal response?
There are three primary tests that courts use to determine whether or not there is a violation of antitrust laws: per se rule, rule of reason, and quick-look analysis. When a court utilizes the per se rule analysis to determine whether there has been a violation of antitrust law, any labor practices that are inherently unreasonable restraints of trade will be invalidated. In Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1 (1958), the Supreme Court stated that there are certain agreements or practices which because of their pernicious effect on competition are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable and therefore illegal. Price-fixing is a per se violation of antitrust laws. Under the rule of reason analysis, a court examines the alleged anticompetitive practice to determine whether or not it is reasonable. Some restraints may be necessary as a legitimate business practice in order to stay in business. The Supreme Court in California Dental Association v. F.T.C., 526 U.S. 756 (1999) upheld the FTC's use of another form of antitrust analysis known as the "quick look" or "structured rule of reason" approach. In recent years courts have fashioned an abbreviated or quick-look rule of reason analysis designed for restraints that do not fall within the narrow categories of restraints deemed per se unlawful, but that are sufficiently anticompetitive that they do not require a full-blown rule of reason inquiry either.
You might also like to view...
If a doctor’s care of a patient falls below the standard of care owed to the patient but the patient did not suffer any physical or mental harm, the patient would not be able to prove medical malpractice.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A directive to a person or organization to appear to testify with specified documents is called a subpoena _____
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The treating physician, or one chosen by the plaintiff's attorney, will provide information on all of the following except:
A. The diagnosis and prognosis B. A treatment plan C. The amount of punitive damages D. The extent of the injuries E. All of the above
A court opinion that applies a case law rule or principle different from that which applies to a client's case may apply as precedent to the client's case when:
A. There is a similarity in language between the common law rules or principles B. There is a similarity in function between the common law rules or principles C. The key facts are identical or nearly identical D. The court opinion is from the same jurisdiction as the client's case E. All of the above F. Answers a and b above G. Answers a, b, and c above