Describe the Mapp v. Ohio ruling. How did the ruling impact the juvenile justice system?
What will be an ideal response?
In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio introduced the exclusionary rule, which stated that evidence seized without a proper search warrant (and probable cause, indicating that a crime has been committed) could not be used in court against adults accused of criminal offenses. Furthermore, based on the Mapp ruling, in State v. Lowery applied the ban against unreasonable search and seizure to juveniles. The court ruled that New Jersey juveniles must be presented with a search warrant before their person or their home could be searched, unless the juvenile waived this right or was caught in a criminal offense.
You might also like to view...
The _____ theory suggests that social institutions serve the interests of the powerful in society and are dysfunctional for many other members of society
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
According to the verdict in U.S. v. Irizarry, the plain-view doctrine applies if officers move objects so they can see evidence otherwise hidden from view
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is a term to describe the referral of disputes to the official, formal court system?
A. mitigation B. negotiation C. litigation D. adjudication
According to Texas statute, the word "building" means any ________ or enclosure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word