Why is defining a “quality” education debated?
What will be an ideal response?
Defining a “quality” education is debated. Whether to measure “input” or “outcomes” is part of the debate. How many students, qualifications of teachers, expenditures, resources and courses offered are all reasonable ways to tally and evaluate the inputs, among others. Outcome is harder. Debates concerning the goals of education are important in deciding which outputs define quality. Completion rates, test scores, and skills gained are all reasonable measures for strictly academic output. What about values as output, whose values? Should education prepare us for life? If so, what does that mean? These debates are far from settled.
You might also like to view...
Any agency wishing to receive federal funds for research must establish an Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
?Nineteenth century allopathic medical schools
a. ?had stringent admissions standards. b. ?trained students primarily through laboratory work. c. trained students primarily through lectures. d. played a critical role in teaching scientific principles to new doctors. e. emphasized scientific research.
Tabloid newspapers and magazines, such as the National Enquirer and People, and television entertainment "news" programs that present "inside" information on the lives of celebrities, demonstrate which form of mass behavior?
A. fads B. gossip C. rumors D. mass hysteria
Which of the following is an example of institutionalized discrimination?
A. Jim Crow Laws B. civil laws C. criminal laws D. stereotyping