In a valid syllogism, if the first two premises are true, then
a. the conclusion must be true.
b. the conclusion must be false.
c. the conclusion could be either true or false.
d. the conclusion must be valid.
a
You might also like to view...
The set "A meteorite reportedly crashed through the roof of a house. It bounced on the living room floor and landed in a chair" is
A) inconsistent, made out of contradictory beliefs B) inconsistent, contains at least one necessarily false belief C) consistent
Which of the following best captures the point of Nielsen's essay? a. We do not need God or any religious notion to support our moralconvictions
b. God is dead. c. Without God, life can have no meaning. d. Without God, all things are permissible.
Epictetus was a(n)
a. Stoic b. Aristotelian c. Epicurean d. Platonist
Considering the context in which it was most likely uttered, would you say the following claim is ambiguous, too vague, or neither?"Your satisfaction is guaranteed with our two-year limited guarantee."
What will be an ideal response?