An undercover police officer has a recording device carried on his body and records an incriminating conversation between himself and an arsonist. No warrant authorizing this recording has been issued to the police officer. What is the likely ruling of the court regarding the use of this recording at trial?
A) The recording is inadmissible.
B) The recording is admissible.
C) The recording itself is inadmissible, but the undercover officer may testify regarding the conversation in court.
D) Miranda warnings were not read to the suspect; therefore, the recording AND conversations are both inadmissible.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
According to Sampson and Laub, ______is the purposeful execution of choice and individual will.
a. human agency b. social capital c. turning points d. hedonism
Left-realists argue that police should reduce their use of force, increase their sensitivity to the public, and be more responsive to community needs
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
_________‘s A Call to Global Islamic Resistance is a lengthy Jihadi Salafist treatise
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
A dependent variable is typically influenced by one or more independent variables
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.