Address and quo warranto proceedings are both methods of
a. evading limits on the Governor's power to make appointments.
b. removing an official from office.
c. promoting the representation of minorities on state boards and commissions.
d. preparing the executive budget.
e. preparing for prosecution of those charged with capital crimes.
B
You might also like to view...
Party organization begins
A. at the national chair B. at the state chair C. at the precinct level D. with the grassroots
Drawing on the insights from the Exit, Voice, and Loyalty game examined in Chapter 3, what can we infer when we see states ignoring the demands of their citizens? For example, if we know that the average North Korean citizen stays in North Korea and is badly treated by the government, and we also see the North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il ignoring his citizens, then we can infer
A. That the citizens have no exit threat and that the state (Kim Jong-Il) depends on the citizens. B. That the citizens do have a credible exit threat and that the state depends on the citizens. C. That the citizens do have a credible exit threat and that the state is autonomous. D. We can’t assume anything about whether the citizens have a credible exit threat but we can assume that the state is autonomous. E. We can’t assume anything about whether the state is autonomous or dependent, but we can assume that the citizens do not have a credible exit threat.
The most important role in disciplining judges is now played by the
A) Texas attorney general's office. B) legislative "address" or impeachment process. C) threat of defeat at the next election cycle. D) Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct.
Among geographical regions, which areas differ the most in political outlook?
A. West Coast and South B. Northeast and South C. Midwest and South D. West Coast and Midwest E. Northeast and West Coast