John and Martha entered into a prenuptial agreement with no intent of ever marrying, although they were cohabiting. When they broke up, Martha tried to enforce the agreement. A court would probably rule:
A. There was no contract because there was no consideration.
B. In Martha's favor because John voluntarily entered into the agreement and signed it.
C. In John's favor because he had most of the assets.
D. That it was enforceable as a quasi-contract.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following does not describe one of the three categories of assailant?
A) fighting without a weapon B) active resister C) aggressive without a weapon D) fighting with a weapon
Intoxication as a defense is based on the impairment to form the requisite_____ for the crime
a. willingness b. defense c. mens rea d. actus reus
In 1993, Dr. David Hall taught forensic botany to CIA trainees
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An incompatibility between a person and his or her environment is a problem that can cause ________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).