In most research studies, statistical techniques are used to rule out chance as a plausible explanation for the results. In single-subject research, how is chance (or coincidence) ruled out as a plausible explanation for the observed treatment effects?
What will be an ideal response?
In single-subject research, chance is ruled out by replicating the treatment effect. Although it is possible that chance or coincidence accounts for changes in behavior when the treatment is first introduced, it is very unlikely that chance will occur again a second, when the treatment is reintroduced.
You might also like to view...
When a(n) _____________ is present the behavior is less likely to occur
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Regarding paranoid psychosis, which of the following statements is FALSE?
a. Persons with paranoid psychosis are rarely treated because they often do not believe that they need help. b. Persons with paranoid psychosis frequently lead lonely, isolated, and humorless lives dominated by constant suspicion and hostility. c. The delusions of persons with paranoid psychosis are usually more bizarre and unrealistic than those delusions experienced by persons with paranoid schizophrenia. d. Although they are not necessarily dangerous, people with paranoid psychosis could be moved to violence by their irrational fears to defend themselves.
Which of the following would NOT be recommended in conducting an eyewitness investigation?
A. Interview several witnesses together to corroborate details B. Carefully construct interview questions upon discovering crime C. Have interviewers who have been trained in the art of interviewing D. Take detailed notes of both the questions asked and the answers given
_____ is caused by a decrease in the secretion of female sex hormones in females during middle adulthood
a. Menarche c. Osteoporosis b. The climacteric d. Depression