If you could set sentencing practices in your state and had to choose between a determinate and an indeterminate scheme, which would you select? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
The issue here is really their views on judicial discretion. If one believes that a judge is in the best position to tailor the sentence to the crime and the characteristics of the defendant, then it would make sense to recommend indeterminate sentencing. The disproportionate sentences that can occur in such states, and the public outrage at the discrepancies, provide support for considering another model of sentencing, such as determinate sentencing.
You might also like to view...
The average annual cost to house an inmate in a state prison is approximately $5,000 dollars
a. true b. false
If a judge erroneously refuses to allow a defendant to be represented by his or her retained counsel, the defendant, if convicted, does not automatically receive a new trial
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
All of the following are false beliefs about policing EXCEPT ______.
a. the primary goals of policing involve reducing crime and disorder b. police officers deter crime through random patrols c. given the facts of a case and all of the latest technology the police can solve crimes through their expertise d. the faster police officers arrive on scene the more likely they are to solve the crime
Which of the following is not a type of issue dealt with by correctional agency legal offices?
a. prosecuting inmates who commit crimes while in prison b. giving general advice regarding implementation of programs in line with past legal decisions c. reviewing policy for legal impact d. responding to inmate lawsuits