Describe the Antifederalists and evaluate their objections to the Constitution. Do you believe their fears were warranted? Why or why not?

Question

Answer:

Answer 1

An ideal response will:
1. Define Antifederalists as those who opposed ratification of the new Constitution and the prospect of a strong central government. They expressed concerns that Congress might obstruct commerce and that infrequent elections might prevent turnover of elected officials. Thus, government officials would be less concerned with their constituents.
2. Note that Antifederalists characterized the Constitution as "an aristocratic document." They also noted that the Constitution did not include a bill of rights to protect the citizenry.
3. Argue whether or not the fears of the Antifederalists were warranted. If arguing that the fears were warranted, note that government can be too strong and authoritative. Citizens are sometimes deprived of their rights. Or, oppressive regulation might impede commerce. If arguing that the Antifederalists' concerns were not warranted, provide support for this assertion. For example, in the United States, protections against government tyranny are widespread. Citizens do have many protections in the Bill of Rights. Additionally, citizens can elect officials and throw them out of office if they are not satisfied.