Today, 75 percent of the area at the equator is covered with water. How
might global temperatures change if ?? percent of the area near the
equator were covered with land? Explain. What will be an ideal response?
Because land has a lower heat capacity than water, more land at the equator would
mean less energy stored. The range of temperatures in the equatorial region would be
greater (both warmer high temperatures and cooler low temperatures). There would be
less ocean to absorb energy and carry it toward the poles, producing cooler mid-latitude
and polar temperatures.
You might also like to view...
What are the consequences of wave refraction?
a. Wave energy is concentrated against sides and ends of headlands b. Wave energy spread out in bays c. Wave erosion straightens irregular shoreline d. All of the above e. both a and c
Which of the three ideas listed above is most reasonable? Why? What will be an ideal response?
Back-to-land vacations, called eco-vacations, have become one of the most lucrative tourism types, with urban dwellers paying tidy sums to harvest grapes or learn cheese-making on farms
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Metamorphic rocks can be metamorphosed
Indicate whether the statement is true or false