What role did the family play in the utopian worlds created by the Shakers, Oneidans, and Mormons? How were the reform efforts of these movements a response to social and economic conditions?
What will be an ideal response?
The Shakers, Oneidans, Mormons, and other utopian societies rejected the period's traditional conceptions of family and of private property. These groups embraced various levels of communism. The Shakers lived celibate lives, with men and women working as equals and living as brothers and sisters, unrestrained by the traditional roles of wife and mother and husband and father. The Oneidans embraced a complex form of marriage and family, embracing free love. The Mormons encouraged economic communism, sharing land ownership and living apart from the general population.
These movements were more radical embodiments of the general push for social reform in America that came with the Second Great Awakening. They sought to establish communities that were heaven on earth. By eliminating private property and the limitations of conventional gender and family roles, these movements appealed to many who felt threatened by or uneasy about the climate created by the market revolution.
You might also like to view...
In Aaron Burr's trial for treason, Chief Justice Marshall insisted that treason need not include overt acts
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Isaac Newton was an inspiration for the Enlightenment in his contention that the world and everything in it worked like a giant machine
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The asiento was a
A) license for foreigners to introduce textiles into the colonies. B) trading post established by a foreign company in Spanish America. C) royal contract with a foreign company to sell black slaves in Spanish colonies. D) Spanish garrison maintained to guard against foreign smugglers in the Indies.
Discuss the contributions of women to the scientific revolution. Did new developments in science and philosophy change gender relations or, instead, support existing distinctions?
What will be an ideal response?