What justifications did the Bush administration offer for the 2003 invasion of Iraq? What explanations did outside observers offer for the invasion?
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. George W. Bush claimed two primary reasons for the invasion: that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction and that it had close ties to al Qaeda.
2. Neither justification was backed up by solid evidence.
3. Some observers believed that Bush was finishing the war his father began in 1991.
4. Other observers emphasized the centrality of Iraq's oil reserves.
5. A deeper reason for the U.S. invasion of Iraq appeared to be the administration's view of September 11 as an opportunity to preemptively reshape the Middle East.
You might also like to view...
The power and control of the First Emperor are best demonstrated by
a. The size of the Qin's realm, which spanned territory from Northern Mongolia to Vietnam. b. Initiating a census of all able-bodied men. c. Viewing his laws as a way to control everyone in his realm regardless of class or wealth. d. Building the Great Wall to protect China from invasion. e. Submitting law and order to a higher power.
Eisenhower's "New Look" foreign policy depended on nuclear armaments and:
A) covert activity. B) expanding the space program. C) forcing the Soviets out of Eastern Europe. D) massive increases in military spending.
What was the significance of the result of the 1936 elections?
What will be an ideal response?
Thomas Peters and John Clarkson compared resettlement in Sierra Leone to __________
a) the Israelites leaving Egypt b) a journey to hell c) a return to paradise d) the voyages of Columbus