Mr. Marsh has a stack of information that he has gathered for his historical-comparative research study, and several ideas and theories are beginning to emerge
He notices that he has primary and secondary sources that clearly conflict with each other on one of the topics with which he has the most interest. Should he "skip" the topic altogether? What if he wants to pursue the topic, what should he do?
What will be an ideal response?
Mr. Marsh needs to evaluate his sources using external and internal criticism. If after evaluating the sources he still has conflicting information, he should look for additional information to collaborate the documents that he has. Perhaps there will not be a resolution. In this case, as an ethical researcher, he will ensure that both points are
represented in his final report.
You might also like to view...
Since its enactment in 1990, enrollment in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program has
a. become so large that over half of students participate in the program. b. dropped off so dramatically as to be affecting a negligible number of students. c. held steady at 1,000 students. d. increased dramatically. e. varied with its support in the state legislature.
Revenue is another word for ______.
A. expenditures B. income C. financial liabilities D. spending commitments
1 With regard to media coverage of court cases:
a. the Constitution gives the media the right to cover all parts of court cases b. media have only those rights granted to them by judges c. parties work to balance open access and the need for a fair trial d. lawyers for the parties work out in advance the level of media coverage for court activities
Identify the two offices within the Executive Office of the President that assist the president in his role as economic manager and the central executive figure in the budgetary process.
What will be an ideal response?