State the logic-of-growth and limits-to-growth theses. Explain how each has a different view of social problems involving the environment as well as their solutions. Is one more politically liberal and one more politically conservative?
What will be an ideal response?
- The logic-of-growth thesis supports economic development and asserts that people can solve whatever environmental problems may arise.
- The limits-to-growth thesis states that societies have little choice but to curb development to avoid environmental collapse.
- Liberals believe that government reforms such as mandatory recycling and strategies to reduce solid waste and develop cleaner-burning fuels are necessary to avoid eventual environmental collapse.
- Conservatives acknowledge the reality of environmental problems but argue that human beings will use their ingenuity and technology to solve them with little need for government regulation.
You might also like to view...
Imagine that you have conducted qualitative interviews with a small sample of nurses about their jobs. You have done 25 interviews, each about 30 minutes long, resulting in about 20 pages of transcription. Now that you have about 500 pages of data, how would you go about analyzing the data?
a. select topics that participants have talked about b. create categories through coding c. look for patterns d. subject to quantitative statistical manipulation e. select topics that participants have talked about, create categories through coding, and after categorizing, look for patterns
The term "social structure" refers to the fact that social relationships:
a. are characterized by recurring patterns of behavior b. are made up of any set of individuals c. are narrowly defined and rigidly enforced d. require constant monitoring for compliance
According to the text, all human beings belong to one biological species; __________
A. Negroid B. Caucasian C. Vulcan D. Homo sapiens
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. George Simmel’s stranger was too far removed from a social group to have objective interactions with other members. 2. George Simmel’s stranger was too far removed from a social group to have some members confide in this remote individual. 3. Like Karl Marx, George Simmel thought superordinate dominated subordinates almost completely. 4. Like Emile Durkheim, George Simmel adopted a realist position that largely looked at society as an entity outside, or over the top of individual people. 5. Even though they are human created forms, according to George Simmel worlds can turn against (?)