Define and contrast the processes of hybrid rulemaking and negotiated rulemaking.
What will be an ideal response?
Hybrid rulemaking is “an attempt at compromise between the thoroughness of the formal process and the relative ease of the informal process.” Negotiated rulemaking is a compromise that recognizes that given the complexity of many policy areas and the number of interests often involved in each policy, it may be easier to negotiate rules rather than make them administratively. Among the contrasts between the two are that hybrid rulemaking was generated in part because of the courts in the United States; accordingly, hybrid rulemaking takes on a structure similar to judicial proceedings. Negotiated rulemaking is an attempt to avoid future ill will be affected parties and more created policies superior to those that emerge from more centrally directed processes.
You might also like to view...
Measurement reactivity refers to
A) Reactions of participants to the experimenter's lab coat. B) The reaction of the experimenters to the obtained data. C) Participant observer bias. D) Participants responding differently because they are being observed.
Which of the following terms describes the group of citizens that is smallest with regard to opinions but that has the largest impact on foreign policy?
a. Attentive public b. Disengaged public c. Foreign policy elite d. Mass public
In a federal system, which of the following powers are held jointly by the national and state governments?
A. Cooperative powers B. Statutory powers C. Reserved powers D. Concurrent powers E. Inherent powers
The legislature has passed laws involving all of the following except
A) reducing frivolous lawsuits. B) restricting lawsuits by prison inmates. C) capping jury awards of punitive damages. D) reforming automobile insurance lawsuits.