INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument. Some tunes are oldies and some oldies are classics. Therefore, some tunes are classics
A) This argument contains a fallacy of weak induction.
B) This argument contains no fallacy.
C) This argument contains a formal fallacy.
D) This argument contains a fallacy of ambiguity.
E) This argument contains a fallacy of relevance.
C
You might also like to view...
The expression mens rea refers to __________
a. Guilty act b. Guilty mind c. Guilty character d. Guilty pleasure
The language “under God” was added to the Pledge of Allegiance in 1954 during the Cold War,
an era when the country was particularly alarmed by atheistic communism. Michael Newdow is an avowed atheist with a daughter in the elementary school of Elk Grove Unified School District in California. He objected to the school district’s requirement that his daughter say the Pledge including “under God,” as he considered that government establishment of religion, in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. His challenge reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which dismissed his claim on a technicality that did not reach this central issue. (The technicality was that Newdow did not have the legal “standing” to raise this issue in the courts.) The issue remains an important one to many people. Some of the justices of the Court indicated that they would not have found this language “under God” a First Amendment violation if they had reached that question. One justice said that the words “under God” do not constitute “a prayer, nor an endorsement of any religion,” but rather “a declaration of belief in allegiance and loyalty to the United States flag and the Republic that it represents.” Another said that this language is an “idiom for essentially secular purposes,” and that it is acceptable to “commemorate the role of religion in our history.” One justice observed that language such as “In God we trust” on our currency is just a reflection of “ceremonial deism” that does not establish any particular religion.
What will be an ideal response?Identify the premise in the following argument: "All moral statements are meaningless because there are no objective criteria for measuring their truth or falsity."
A. "...truth or falsity." B. "...because..." C. "All moral statements are meaningless..." D. "...there are no objective criteria for measuring their truth or falsity."
The free consent of sexual partners is desirable but not absolutely essential,
according to Farley.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.