In Porras v. State, the court held that?
A. ?the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Porras was guilty of the crimes of which he was convicted.
B. ?Porras's conviction should be reversed; the evidence of the alternative account of the shooting was substantial, such that the jury could not have found Porras guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
C. ?the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to convict Porras and, although the trial court erroneously failed to charge that a witness can be impeached by proof of a prior felony conviction, the error was harmless.
D. ?the trial court's failure to charge that a witness also may be impeached by proof that the witness has been convicted of a felony was prejudicial error, and Porras's conviction should be reversed.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
The common law and amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure suggest that a client does not need to preserve documents related to a dispute until litigation has been formally filed
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Although professionalism is a goal to be achieved by all court reporters, most court reporters are unprofessional and unethical
a. True b. False
If there is a difference between the tort of fraud and the crime of fraud, it is
A) the nature of the harm caused B) the burden of proof C) whether the fraud proximately caused harm D) how frequently the defendant acted to deceive
The "no breach, excuse" response includes impossibility, impracticability, and frustration of purpose.?
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)