Which best describes the decision in Printz v. United States?
a. State governments cannot require federal officials to perform state functions.
b. State officials are prohibited from performing federal functions.
c. The Supreme Court would no longer automatically endorse assertions of federal power at the expense of state authority.
d. The government of one state cannot regulate the conduct of citizens from another state.
c
You might also like to view...
Koenkai are
a. Japanese firms and industries that are publicly or semipublicly owned. b. Japanese private contractors who are increasingly responsible for conducting administrative affairs for the central government. c. highly personalized campaign organizations that carry out constituency services. d. neighborhood associations that manage Japanese polling places during elections. e. Japanese officials employed by the government's central election board.
All of these are examples of public interest groups EXCEPT
A. the National Taxpayers Union. B. the Sierra Club. C. Public Citizen. D. the AFL-CIO. E. Common Cause.
A criminal case is an example of:
a. one-shotters against repeat players b. prosecutorial discretion c. repeat players against one-shotters d. the ability of courts to function properly
Debates over federalism ______.
A. were fully resolved by the Civil War that established the supremacy of the national government over the states B. were fully resolved in the U.S. Constitution with the broad grant of powers to the national government C. have not been fully resolved as debates over the Affordable Care Act, the legalization of marijuana, and immigration laws D. have not been fully resolved because the states are increasingly unwilling to follow guidelines issued by the federal government