Explain the rules and the logic for police use of deadly force and nondeadly force both under the old fleeing-felon rule and today. Why did the court change from one rule to the other? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
In 1985, in Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court held that the police may resort to deadly force to apprehend a fleeing felon under the Fourth Amendment when the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect threatens the officer with a weapon or when there is probable cause to believe that he or she has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm. The officer, where feasible, should issue a warning. Four years later, in Graham v. Connor, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the exercise of nondeadly force also is to be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard.
You might also like to view...
The presence of cameras can have a restraining influence on overzealous police authorities
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
You are a case officer who needs to determine treatment plans for 50 different clients under your supervision. You must make sure each client gets the individual attention he or she needs, but your own time is limited. How do you decide which are the most important dynamic factors to consider when determining treatment plans? What leads you to your opinion?
What will be an ideal response?
Descriptive statistics estimate the degree of confidence that can be placed in generalizations for a sample and for the population from which the sample was selected.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Citizen police academies train citizens to be police officers when the police are not available
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false