InSessoms v. Grounds, the court held that?
A. ?because Sessoms's response to the officers was a question, his desire for an attorney was ambiguous and unclear.
B. ?a suspect must clearly state any request for an attorney, which Sessoms failed to do.
C. ?Sessoms did not articulate his desire to have counsel present sufficiently clearly that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be a request for an attorney.
D. ?under the circumstances, a reasonable law enforcement officer would have understood Sessoms's statements as an unambiguous request for counsel, which should have cut off any further questioning under clear Supreme Court precedent.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
A case status sheet tells the judge whether parties are ready for trial.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
While counsel need not supervise every step of the document production process and may rely on their clients in some respects, discovery rules require counsel's responses to be made upon reasonable inquiry under the circumstances
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A(n) ________ is a legal arrangement by which a lender, such as a bank, provides a borrower with the money to purchase real estate
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
What the breaching party expected to receive and did receive must be considered when calculating damages based on a restitution interest.?
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)