How are the general principles of the CISG interpreted when dealing with a dispute?
What will be an ideal response?
The CISG calls for courts to look to the general principles on which the convention is based when interpreting its provisions, but it gives no list of general principles. It is for the courts to divine those principles. The following two have been suggested: (1) A party to a contract has the duty to communicate information needed by the other party, and (2) parties have the obligation to mitigate damages resulting from a breach. Both concepts appear, in varying forms, throughout the convention. Although the CISG does not give a list of general principles, it does set out the mechanism for determining them. They must be derived (as is the case for the suggestions listed above) from particular sections of the convention and then extended, by analogy, to the case at hand.
You might also like to view...
As a consequence of many manufacturing firms attempting to reduce the number of suppliers with which they deal, vendors that do not supply products with high quality and reliable delivery schedules may expect to be forced out of business
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
How does the owner withdrawing cash from the business affect the accounting equation?
A) assets decrease; owner's equity decreases B) assets decrease; owner's equity increases C) assets increase; liabilities decrease D) no effect on the assets, liabilities, or owner's equity
Which of the following is not one of the types of activities that is summarized on the statement of cash flows?
A) Organizing B) Financing C) Investing D) Operating
What is a poka-yoke? Give an example
What will be an ideal response?