What are possible explanations of the democratic peace from the identity perspective?
What will be an ideal response?
The identity perspective would argue that democracies do not go to war with each other either because they are more peaceful (due to their internal characteristics, or identity) or because they share common domestic norms and institutions.
You might also like to view...
How do we know if a theory is degenerate and just plain wrong?
a. If it fails an empirical test b. If there are other theories that are better able to account for the facts c. If we need to add auxiliary arguments to explain every event d. If it cannot account for new developments
The Constitution prohibits the state governments from all of the following EXCEPT
A) passing bills of attainder. B) passing ex post facto laws. C) taxing imports and exports. D) entering into any treaty or alliance with foreign nations. E) having state income taxes.
Of the following, who was appointed by President George W. Bush?
a. Justice Alito b. Justice Kagan c. Justice Thomas d. Justice Ginsburg
Which of the following statements about nuclear power and Iran is NOT true? a. Iran sees nuclear power as a matter of both sovereignty and modernity
b. While the Bush Administrations accepted Iran's right to enrich uranium so long as it guaranteed that it did not do so to the point of producing nuclear weapons, the Obama Administration has not. c. Iran's plans to develop nuclear power have been delayed because of U.S. pressure on Europe not to transfer such technology to Iran. d. The United States and Israel developed a cyber-sabotage program to infect Iranian computers used to control the production of enriched uranium. e. The United States and other Western powers believe that any nuclear technology in the hands of Iran could be passed on to terrorist organizations.