What is Dr. Hasnas's explanation for the "litigation explosion"?
What will be an ideal response?
Dr. John Hasnas believes that the litigation explosion should come as no surprise. Dr. Hasnas sees this increase as a predictable consequence of Prosser's premise that the "business of the courts is to make precedent where a wrong calls for redress even if lawsuits must be multiplied." He claims that if the purpose of the tort system is to vindicate the wrongs suffered by members of society, then as the demands of social justice increase, new causes of action must be created to keep pace with newly recognized wrongs. Furthermore, the system's procedures must be changed to assist plaintiffs in getting before the courts, and the system must contain a punitive element to deter misconduct by potential tortfeasors. Given these parameters, the litigation explosion is a natural consequence, not an aberration.
You might also like to view...
Provide the definition of real and personal property. Now take a look at the property you own and categorize it as real or personal.
What will be an ideal response?
Written court decisions that serve as precedent are known as:
A. Regulations B. Statutes C. Case law D. Court rules E. None of the above
Rules of Court highlight procedural requirements most pertinent to daily practice, process, and procedures for various courts, and are packaged in a desk copy edition for quick and easy reference
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
It is important to remind the plaintiff that the defendant's physician is not there to provide help or advice
Indicate whether the statement is true or false