Sammy Kim confessed to (and truly committed) purse snatching; but due to the exclusion of particular evidence at trial, the jury found Sammy not guilty. We can say that Sammy is:
a. legally guilty but not factually guilty.
b. factually guilty but not legally guilty.
c. both legally and factually guilty.
d. neither legally nor factually guilty.
b. factually guilty but not legally guilty.
You might also like to view...
In Schmerber v. California (1966), the Court ruled that suspects may refuse to participate in a lineup, and such refusal may not be used against them in court
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
School probation started in
a. Massachusetts b. New York c. Pennsylvania d. California
The _____ is the critical target for counterterrorism
a. Node b. Unit c. Mode d. Cell
________ allows evidence to be admissible if its discovery was not related to any improper search or seizure.
A. Attenuation B. The good faith exception C. The inevitable discovery exception D. The independent source exception