Complete performance of the duties required under a contract is the most common way to terminate those duties. Describe three situations in which-less-than complete performance may be acceptable.
What will be an ideal response?
Conditions expressly stated in a contract must be fully satisfied for complete performance to take place. There are three situations, however, in which less-than-complete performance may be acceptable:•Substantial performance-A party who in good faith performs substantially all of the terms of a contract can usually enforce the contract against the other party under the doctrine of substantial performance. Generally, performance that provides a party with the important and essential benefits of a contract, in spite of any omission or deviation from the terms, is substantial performance. Because substantial performance is not perfect, the other party is entitled to damages to compensate for the failure to comply with the contract.•Impossibility of performance-After a contract has been made, performance may become impossible in an objective sense ("it can't be done," rather than "I can't do it").For example, the subject matter of the contract may be destroyed, one of the parties to a personal contract may die or become incapacitated prior to performance, or performance may become illegal because of a change in the law. In these situations, the law excuses parties from their contractual performance.•Commercial impracticability-Under this doctrine, courts may excuse parties from their performance obligations when the performance becomes much more difficult or expensive than contemplated at the time the contract was formed. For someone to invoke this doctrine successfully, however, the anticipated performance must become extremely difficult or costly.
You might also like to view...
Attorney's work product is?
A. ?all the evidence gathered. B. ?motions and briefs. C. ?privileged. D. ?authenticated.
The heading of an office legal memorandum usually includes information identifying the subject matter of the memo.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Steve Gates was one of the engineers who developed the Accelerex device for Electro Tech. Because he was nearly 90 years old, Kate Sandberg's team took his deposition before trial to preserve his testimony. During his testimony, he provided a vivid description of how he was inspired to develop the device. However, because of his advanced age, his testimony was often muddled and difficult to
understand. The trial team also wants to highlight key statements in his testimony. What tools are available to help the team with these issues? What will be an ideal response?
What is a Markman hearing?
What will be an ideal response?