Which of the following best describes the Court’s ruling on eavesdropping in Katz v. U.S.?

A. Eavesdropping never requires a warrant.
B. Eavesdropping without a warrant is allowed as long as police don’t violate the “physical penetration” rule.
C. Eavesdropping without a warrant is not permitted in a home but is constitutional in a phone booth because there is no expectation of privacy.
D. Eavesdropping constitutes a “search and seizure” and thus requires a warrant.


D. Eavesdropping constitutes a “search and seizure” and thus requires a warrant.

Criminal Justice

You might also like to view...

"Latent examination" refers to specialists trained in recording, identifying, and interpreting the minutiae of physical evidence, who usually work at crime scenes and in a crime lab

a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Criminal Justice

One factor responsible for the rising incarceration rates is that ____ are now more likely to be incarcerated, especially for drug offenses.

Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).

Criminal Justice

Low-level property offenders commit robbery, theft, and forgery

a. True b. False

Criminal Justice

What does it mean to say that the researcher has achieved Authenticity with his/her research?

What will be an ideal response?

Criminal Justice