Which of the following best describes the Court’s ruling on eavesdropping in Katz v. U.S.?
A. Eavesdropping never requires a warrant.
B. Eavesdropping without a warrant is allowed as long as police don’t violate the “physical penetration” rule.
C. Eavesdropping without a warrant is not permitted in a home but is constitutional in a phone booth because there is no expectation of privacy.
D. Eavesdropping constitutes a “search and seizure” and thus requires a warrant.
D. Eavesdropping constitutes a “search and seizure” and thus requires a warrant.
You might also like to view...
"Latent examination" refers to specialists trained in recording, identifying, and interpreting the minutiae of physical evidence, who usually work at crime scenes and in a crime lab
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
One factor responsible for the rising incarceration rates is that ____ are now more likely to be incarcerated, especially for drug offenses.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Low-level property offenders commit robbery, theft, and forgery
a. True b. False
What does it mean to say that the researcher has achieved Authenticity with his/her research?
What will be an ideal response?