Richard agrees to supply Henry with all his needs of specially made shampoo for Henry's beauty salon. Henry believes that Richard is a representative of a famous hair products company, but he finds a letter to a competitor written by Richard two days
before the agreement is signed proving that Richard is a fraud. Richard says that this letter may not be admitted to court since the contract is wholly integrated. Is he correct?
No, prior and contemporary evidence is excludable, but only if it changes the terms of the contract. Here the evidence is admitted for the purpose of proving fraud in the inducement.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following con?ict strategy guidelines suggests creating a four-part assertion message?
A) plan what you want to say B) set the stage for ?nding a solution C) express appreciation D) chose the right time
Mexico is poised to become the largest auto manufacturing location in the world, thanks to its ______.
A. infrastructure B. political environment C. liberal free trade policies D. legal system
Communication and coordination are served by budgets
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is not a verbal barrier to communication?
A) inadequate understanding B) differences in interpretation C) specific, concrete words D) inappropriate use of expressions E) language differences