In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that reveals no information other than the location of an illegal substance that no individual has any right to possess does not violate the:
a. Fourth Amendment.
b. Fifth Amendment.
c. Sixth Amendment.
d. Eighth Amendment.
a
Criminal Justice
You might also like to view...
The primary reason why the Supreme Court decided in Stovall v. Denno (1967) to allow eyewitness evidence taken during a one-person showup was the convenience of the police
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Criminal Justice
Quid pro quo
What will be an ideal response?
Criminal Justice
Where an arrest was based on probable cause, a search incident to this arrest is allowable provided by the Supreme Court in
a. Katz v. United States (1967). b. Carroll v. United States (1925). c. Chimel v. California (1969). d. United States v. Robinson (1973).
Criminal Justice
How was Locard influential in the development of forensic science in Europe?
What will be an ideal response?
Criminal Justice