Should open fields have Fourth Amendment protection?
What will be an ideal response?
The Court has consistently ruled that open fields do not enjoy Fourth Amendment protection. This ideology, known as the open fields doctrine, was first enunciated in the case of Hester v. United States. Their rationale largely lay in the accessibility of fields to the general public and to law enforcement officials. The Court, however, has recognized that some areas attached to a private residence, known as curtilage, may be afforded protection under the Bill of Rights. Opinions regarding open fields will vary.
You might also like to view...
Federal criminal prosecutions in white collar crime cases are initiated by which of the following?
a. The Department of Justice or U.S. Attorneys b. Federal regulatory agencies c. Federal investigative agencies d. The Inspector Generals
Which of the following is not one of Michael Johnson’s (2007) forms of IPV?
a. Situation violence b. Panviolent c. Intimate terrorism d. Violence resistance
A(n) _________ prison is a correctional institution that houses dangerous felons and maintains strict security measures, high walls, and limited contact with the outside world
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The terrorist ideology supports a system of beliefs that allows for the ________ of the lives of innocent victims, in most cases civilian victims of so-called targeted enemy societies
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word