Evaluate the following generalization(s), identifying sample, population, attribute of interest, and the extent to which the claims involved are knowable. Consider carefully the size and diversification of the sample and the extent to which the population differs or may differ from the sample; remember, what's important is that the sample be representative.Haslett wanted to know what percentage of students at his college vote in local elections. He asked each of his professors (he was a political science major) to ask for a show of hands in his classes, so he could make a count. He found that 45 percent of the 120 classmates polled vote in local elections. He concludes that about 45 percent of the students at his college vote in those elections.
What will be an ideal response?
The sample is large enough to be somewhat reliable, although Haslett should not be surprised by a substantial deviation from his 45 percent projection. A more serious problem is that Haslett's poll may have been taken in political science classes (or at least mainly in political science classes) and that people who take such classes may be more interested in political matters and hence more likely to vote in any election. The possibility of bias is substantial.
You might also like to view...
Verbal extensional definitions resemble ostensive definitions in which of the following way (or ways)
a. they resolve ambiguities. b. they eliminate vagueness. c. they select members of the set to which the term applies. d. All of these choices.
Mill answers the question "How can I know what is right?" by arguing that
A) it is impossible to know what is right. B) nothing is always right. C) the principle of utility can tell us what is right. D) only God's word can tell us what is right.
The general proposition that a firm has a legitimate interest only in employee behavior that significantly influences
work performance applies equally to off-the-job conduct.
a. True b. False
Quantum mechanics and Taoism share the view that reality is:
a. one b. dual c. multi-dimensional d. impossible to understand