How is a case determined to be a justiciable dispute and therefore eligible to be heard by a federal judge?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Discuss how the federal judiciary is a passive and reactive branch. It does not instigate cases or conduct its own investigations, nor can it resolve every issue that comes before it.
2. Explain that, according to the Constitution, federal judges are to decide cases and controversies. It is not enough that a judge believes a particular law to be unconstitutional; a real case must be litigated for a judge to reach that decision
You might also like to view...
Research suggests that the overriding bias in the news is one toward stories that __________
a. favor liberals b. favor conservatives c. draw the largest audience d. put the president in a good light
Most of the growth in federal grants as sources of revenues for state governments has come from TRICARE
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What are some of the policies adopted by various states to overcome the problem of juries being filled only with the unemployed, older people, single people, and others that were unable to be excused?
What will be an ideal response?
Aristotle's philosophy differed from Plato's in which of these ways?
a. Aristotle focused on abstract ideals, while Plato focused more on reality. b. Aristotle focused on government organization, while Plato focused more on philosophical ideals. c. Aristotle advocated for good leadership, while Plato mainly warned against the dangers of poor leadership. d. Aristotle advocated for traditional families, while Plato mainly warned against the dangers of favoritism.