Discuss the debate over judicial activism.Examine the five ways it is expressed by comparing the proponents and critics of each approach
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Discuss the recent trend toward using judicial review to monitor the activities of other governmental entities. Liberal critics worry that the Court, dominated by a solid conservative majority, is too frequently reversing the actions of popularly elected bodies—Congress and state legislatures.
2, Discuss the trend toward reversing the decisions of past Supreme Courts, and overturning the Court's own precedent. Critics charge that the nature of cases are being changed to provide an opportunity to change the law.
3, Explain the Court's involvement in political issues. Critics claim that the Court is taking on too many matters that are best left to the elected branches of government, such as become increasingly involved in the process of drawing congressional electoral district boundaries in the states. Defenders of the Court argue that when such basic constitutional rights as equality of citizenship are at peril, the Court is obligated to protect these rights, no matter what other government bodies may choose to do.
4, Acknowledge the pros and cons of remedies and original intent.
You might also like to view...
The "Washington Consensus" is critical of neoliberal policies
a. True b. False
The narrative is a critical element in which of the following?
A. experimental design B. nomothetic explanations C. causal mechanism D. idiographic explanations
Being informed about Texas state government is ultimately the responsibility of __________.
A. newspapers and radio B. interest groups C. individual citizens D. elected officials
When a wealthy voter believes that the government is spending too much on social welfare programs, she is probably ______.
A. rejecting her party identification B. falling prey to the spiral of silence C. following her economic self-interest D. reflecting the view of her political generation