Explain direct and circumstantial evidence and the need for all evidence to be admissible by being relevant, material, and competent
What will be an ideal response?
Direct evidence proves a fact without the need for inference or presumption, while circumstantial evidence does require a presumption that indirectly proves a fact. Relevance is the mainstay of evidence admissibility and is any material fact or information which tends to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Materiality refers for evidence that is logically connected to a fact at issue and includes a consideration of the germaneness of information or testimony and a determination as to its impact on the trial at hand. Competent evidence is that evidence which is both relevant and material which has no impediment to its admissibility. Ideally direct evidence should outweigh circumstantial, but both have been used to prove mental state, intent, and motive.
You might also like to view...
In the prosecution's and defense's "case-in-chief" expert witnesses can offer ___________ testimony
Fill in the blank with correct word.
______, refers to groups that engage in violence in an effort to control the government if it strays from an acceptable course of action and policy.
a. innate control vigilantism b. crime-control vigilantism c. social group-control vigilantism d. regime-control vigilantism
In which of the following situations would an individual have Sixth Amendment protections?
A. A drug dealer whom the police is investigating B. A murderer who has formal charges filed against him by the state prosecutor and is released on bail C. A burglar who was caught going into a jewelry store and was arrested by police D. A robber who was arrested by police and is being transported to the county jail
What are the emotional and psychological consequences of robbery?
What will be an ideal response?