How, if at all, should the definitions of integrity, agreement and validity for reliable multicast change for the case of open groups?
What will be an ideal response?
For open groups, the definitions of integrity and agreement do not change. The validity property is not appropriately defined for open groups, since senders are not necessarily members of the group.
For open groups we can define validity as follows: ‘If a correct process multicasts message m, then some member of group(m) will eventually deliver m.’
You might also like to view...
Accessor methods:
a. return something equivalent to the value of an instance variable. b. promotes abstraction c. both A and B d. none of the above
You can use a ____ to pause execution at a specific line in the code.
A. comment B. breakpoint C. function header D. wait
_________ tools can be used to place controls on the form with greater accuracy
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
If a style has both a paragraph and a character symbol next to it in the Styles pane, it is ________
A) a linked style B) the default style C) part of the Normal template D) a crossover style