In order to prevent the 17 year-old boy from being executed, “Execution Stoppers” merely needs to mention one Supreme Court precedent. Based on your first year of training in law school, you recognize that this 2005 case is called:
In the summer after your first year at law school, you begin an internship at a Texas law firm called “Execution Stoppers.” As you discerned from their name, they specialize in keeping accused criminals off death row. On your first day at the firm, they ask you to write a memo summarizing their three easiest cases of the month. Case 1 involves a 17 year-old boy who is accused of felony murder, a capital offense in that state. Case 2 involves an accused murdered whose IQ score is 62. Case 3 involves an individual who raped and murdered a child. Answer the following questions about the report you will craft to summarize these cases.
a. Atkins v. Virginia
b. Miranda v. Arizona
c. Ewing v. California
d. Roper v. Simmons
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
White-collar crime is the violation of criminal law committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his or her occupation
a. True b. False
Deoxyribonucleic acid is an organic substance contained in a cell's nucleus
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain how judges and statutes can induce guilty pleas
What will be an ideal response?
The procedural category of plans are ordinarily included as part of a police department's written directive system, a copy of which is assigned to every officer and is updated periodically
Indicate whether the statement is true or false