In the case In re Marriage of Thornton, 95 Cal. App 4th 251 (2002), there was no triggering event identified in the agreement that terminated alimony. Therefore:
A. The omission caused the alimony award to continue indefinitely.
B. Statutory language was used to enable the husband to terminate alimony upon the remarriage of his ex-spouse.
C. The court automatically had continuing jurisdiction, which enabled the wife to seek additional alimony.
D. Remarriage was found not to be an event that would trigger termination of alimony.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
A factor that was used by the majority in its decision in Scott v. Harris (2007 ) was that
A. The high speed chase took place at night when few pedestrians were out B. Part of the chase occurred on a four lane road C. Tennessee v. Garner (1985 ) was not precedent D. Police had the license plate number of the fleeing automobile
According to Nicholas Groth, which type of rape always involves both sexuality and aggression?
A. Anger B. Sadistic C. Power D. Date
Judges may order misdemeanor offenders to perform community service as a substitute for a(n) ________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The interview process is not as critical as the written exam and therefore is less formal
Indicate whether the statement is true or false