Under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, what is the practical application of the right to confront one’s accusers? May a state enact a rule of evidence that conflicts with this right? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
The Sixth Amendment right to confront one’s accuser means that a defendant has the right to cross-examine the witnesses of the prosecution. While each state may draft its own rules of evidence, it may not enact a rule of evidence that conflicts with a defendant’s right to confrontation, as this would violate the U.S. Constitution.
You might also like to view...
Which term refers to nonadversarial tribunals that focus on helping defendants?
a. problem-solving boards b. problem-solving courts c. problem-solving hearings d. problem-solving committees
What is FLIR?
What will be an ideal response?
Departments need to provide officers and their families ________ avenues of support and assistance before an incident of domestic violence occurs
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
In _____, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the death penalty for juveniles was unconstitutional
a. Graham v. Florida b. In re Gault c. Atkins v. Virginia d. Roper v. Simmons