Marcy and Elliot are both sophisticated merchants who deal in diamonds. Marcy contracted to purchase a diamond for $20,000 . The day after the purchase, Marcy took the diamond to a jeweler's show but the highest offer for the diamond was only $10,000 . Is Marcy's contract for purchase of the diamond for $20,000 unconscionable?
Probably not. The parties had equal bargaining power in that they were both experts in this field. Elliot did not use a superior position to force the contract on Marcy. Furthermore, Marcy is going to have a tough argument to say she did not fully understand the consequences of the agreement.
You might also like to view...
Solvency analysis focuses on the ability of a business to pay its current and noncurrent liabilities
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What specific internal control procedure would prevent an accounts receivable clerk from issuing a fictitious credit memo to a customer (who is also a relative) for goods that were "supposedly" returned from previous sales?
Which of the following statements correctly describes the effect of the Canadian Human Rights Act?
A) Drug addiction is not a prohibited ground of discrimination. B) Disability is defined to include drug addiction. C) Only a current addiction is considered to be a disability. D) Drug addiction can be grounds for firing if abstaining from drugs is a bona fide occupational requirement. E) Both B and D
What role does accountability play in business life?
a. It encourages businesses to strive for increased revenue. b. It fosters laissez-faire attitudes to economic growth. c. It protects and enhances the general welfare of society. d. It restricts health warnings on harmful products. e. It helps to maximize profits for shareholders.