What are the key differences between “early deciders,” “late deciders,” and “active players”?
What will be an ideal response?
These all describe different types of decision-makers when it comes to the choice of when to make decisions in the deliberative process. Early deciders are strong supporters who wish to get out in front of the debate. In contrast, active players may delay any firm commitment in order to entertain offers from all sides and attempt to gain leverage over the final language of legislation. Finally, late deciders wait until the last moment. This gives them less leverage to influence the basic framework of legislation but may allow them to obtain specific concessions.
You might also like to view...
The concept of “mutual assured destruction” refers to
a. the basic policy of European states in World War I. b. the factor leading to the outbreak of World War II. c. the expected outcome of nuclear war. d. the basic realist understanding of the effects of war.
The federal judiciary is a passive and reactive branch, meaning that __________
a. it is reluctant to reverse prior court decisions b. it cannot instigate cases or conduct its own investigations c. it is reluctant to exercise the power of judicial review d. it only acts after the president and Congress have made their intentions clear
What are civil rights? What are natural rights? How are both sets of rights protected by the Constitution, either explicitly or implicitly?
Answer:
Younger adults tend to be much more politically engaged than are middle-aged people
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.