The case that established that a search conducted by a private security officer does not violate an individual's 4th amendment rights because this only applies to governmental agents was Mapp v. Ohio
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
False
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is true of evidence-based practices?
A. They are strategies that demonstrably result in positive outcomes. B. They are known to be inconsistent in producing desired outcomes. C. They have resulted in the American police force becoming less disciplined. D. They have resulted in an increase in criminality.
Ego-based commitments and excessive devotions to traditions are representative of what type of error of reasoning?
A. resistance to change B. overgeneralization C. selective observation D. inaccurate observation
Where evidence has been illegally seized by a government agent in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the current approach that excludes the illegally-seized evidence from trial to prove guilt
A) has the effect of directly punishing the police officers who have made a mistake. B) has the effect of placing the suspect and the government in the same position, legally and evidentially, that they would have occupied had the government agent not violated the law. C) gives a potential defendant a free pass from any further prosecution on crimes that the evidence would have helped prove. D) does not allow any use of the illegally seized evidence for any purpose under any circumstances. E) none of the above is a correct response.
The idea that punishing an individual will keep that person from reoffending in the future is called:
A. Incapacitation B. Retribution C. Specific deterrence D. General deterrence