Determine whether the following claim is best classified as semantically ambiguous (and whether this contains grouping ambiguities), syntactically ambiguous, or free from ambiguity: Headline: Retired priest may marry Springsteen.
What will be an ideal response?
Syntactically ambiguous.
You might also like to view...
Genevieve Lloyd argues that
a. although rationality is contrary to the emotions, women are capable of non emotional, objective thought. b. the romantics were correct in rejecting reason in favor of the emotions. c. the dichotomy between the intellect and the emotions is a false one. d. while women are not as rational as men, they do excel in the areas of the emotions and the imagination.
"Corporate infighting," "management power struggles," "maneuvering and politics and power grabbing" and
"Machiavellian intrigues" are all phrases H. Ross Perot uses to describe
a. the reality of family life today. b. the reality of corporate life today. c. the reality of the lunch room. d. the reality of the drive into work.
The sort of metaphysical knowledge of Atman-Brahman that Shankara is concerned with is
A) intellectual. B) totally subjective. C) scientific. D) liberating.
A heap argument raises a paradox because of
A) the confused way of applying one of the argument's predicates. B) the ambiguity of one of the argument's terms. C) the vagueness of one of the argument's terms.