If "Some salacious sages are not prosaic prophets" is true, what can be inferred about "No prosaic prophets are nonsalacious sages"? Explain.
What will be an ideal response?
Some salacious sages are not prosaic prophets. (T)
No prosaic prophets are nonsalacious sages. (NG) Conversion on an O is not valid, and so we can't get the statements to correspond.
You might also like to view...
Confucian teachings were revived through Neo-Confucianism because some believed that
a. Confucius was about return to earth to judge them. b. old Confucian doctrines were outdated. c. Hinduism was threatening traditional Chinese beliefs and practices. d. Buddhist and Daoist practices had brought about political weakness.
Syllogism 4D Given the following syllogism: A few Hondas are not on sale, because the cars with green tags are not on sale and a few Hondas have green tags. After translating Syllogism 4D into standard form, the conclusion is:
A) Some cars that are on sale are not Hondas. B) Some Hondas are cars with green tags. C) All cars with green tags are cars that are not on sale. D) Some Hondas are not cars that are on sale. E) No cars with green tags are cars on sale.
Determine whether the following passage contains an argument; if it does, identify the main issue.Because men admire muscle and physical force, they assume that women do too.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The factions of the church at Corinth addressed in 1 Corinthians were largely caused by personal loyalties to one of four persons: Paul, Apollos, Cephas, and Christ
Indicate whether the statement is true or false