A dentist learns that a patient has AIDS so he refuses to give the patient a midday appointment and will only give a last of the day appointment
The patient complains that she is being discriminated against contrary to the applicable provisional Human Rights Act. Which of the following statements isTRUE?
A) The Act applies because the dentist is offering a service to the public.
B) The Act does not apply because this is not an employment or housing situation.
C) The complaint will be dismissed because having AIDS is not a grounds for discrimination on the basis of disability.
D) The complaint will be dismissed because the dentist's actions were reasonable and in good faith.
E) Both A and D
70. Which of the following would NOT be a type of accommodation a company may be required to make for an employee?
A) purchase adaptive technology to assist a disabled worker
B) install disabled washrooms
C) change the employee's work hours
D) restructure job duties to fit the employee's special needs
E) a company could be required to do any of these actions to accommodate a worker
A
You might also like to view...
What are the two ways in which a company can extend its product line?
What will be an ideal response?
Doro Fill Company fabricates automobiles
Each auto includes one wiring harness, which is currently made in-house. Details of the harness fabrication are as follows: Volume 800 units per month Variable cost per unit $6 per unit Fixed costs $13,000 per month A factory in Indonesia has offered to supply Doro Fill with ready-made units for a cost of $12 each. Assume that Doro Fill's fixed costs are unavoidable and that the company will not be able to use the excess capacity in any profitable manner. In order to maximize operating income, Doro Fill should not outsource. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
By holding focus groups with employees, Robert Keening of Snow Bird Airlines is employing which aspect of total quality management?
A. Democratic leadership B. Reaching consensus C. Customer satisfaction D. Obtaining feedback E. Employee participation
In Bowman v. Monsanto, where Bowman used Monsanto's patented Roundup Ready seeds and, in violation of the contract provided by Monsanto, kept seeds from his crop to use next year so that the seeds had the genetic composition of the Monsanto seeds. The Supreme Court held that:
a. Monsanto's patent failed for obviousness, so there was no fringement b. Monsanto's patent failed because it was prior art, so there was no infringement c. there was no infringement because the seeds were in the public domain d. none of the other choices