In the Lesher v. Strid case, the court held that:
a. a representation is material if it is likely to influence a reasonable person.
b. for a misrepresentation to be actionable, it must be one of fact rather than of opinion.
c. a mutual mistake of fact renders a contract voidable by the adversely affected party if the mistake is so fundamental that it frustrates the purpose of the contract.
d. the contract's "as is" clause expressly excluded reliance on extrinsic representations such as the defendant's representation about the four-acre water rights.
c
You might also like to view...
The market leader should look for new customers or more usage from existing customers
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Layouts ______.
A. once implemented can be easily changed B. may need to be changed to respond more rapidly to market opportunities C. are regulated by the government D. may need to be in compliance with ISO standards
Sean purchased a new car. One of the car's wheels came undone, and Sean crashed into a tree. Sean was not wearing his seatbelt when the car crashed. Sean filed a lawsuit against the car manufacturer
Which of the following statements is true in this scenario? A) Sean assumed the risk as he was not wearing a seatbelt. B) The car manufacturer is guilty of a strict liability tort. C) Assumption of the risk is not a valid defense against Sean, as he could not have known that the wheel would become detached. D) The car manufacturer can win the lawsuit by establishing the negligence per se doctrine.
The doctrine of incorporation holds that customary international law is not applicable until clearly adopted by legislative action, judicial decision, or established local usage
Indicate whether the statement is true or false