Albert collapsed on the sidewalk. Barney witnessed this occurrence but did nothing and walked past the slumped over Albert. It turns out Albert had a serious stroke. Because of the lack of medical care, Albert died. His heirs sued Barney. The likely outcome is:
a. The heirs will win and will receive an extra-large verdict because of Barney's egregious behavior.
b. The judge will decide that Barney had no legal duty owing to Albert.
c. The outcome of the case will depend on why Barney did not stop to help Albert.
d. The outcome of the case will depend on the seriousness of Albert's injury and whether or not it was reasonable for Albert to render aid.
B
You might also like to view...
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid the imposition of the death penalty on persons who were under what age when they committed their crime?
a. Age 16 b. Age 17 c. Age 18 d. Age 21
At the federal level, the highest level of appeal is:
A) The appellate division B) The circuit court of appeal for that federal district C) The highest state appellate court D) The United States Supreme Court
Under what circumstances will a liquidated damages provision be upheld by a court?
What will be an ideal response?
Joe Josey has a hot temper and has been drinking heavily at the Circle K bar. He believes that the young man occupying the bar stool next to his is trying to make a pass at the bartender, who happens to be Joe's girlfriend. Joe stands up and tries to punch the young man, but instead stumbles and smacks the little old lady on the next bar stool over. She falls and suffers a concussion. The concept
that best explains why Joe may be criminally liable for the harm the old 135 lady suffers is: A) actus reus. B) mens rea. C) specific intent. D) transferred intent. E) all of the above