In Weeks v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court held that _____.
A) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in federal courts
B) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in state courts
C) federal police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
D) state police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
A) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in federal courts
You might also like to view...
You are conducting a research project that calls for both a narrative analysis and a conversation analysis. Name one research question that could be answered by each of these analyses.
What will be an ideal response?
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. When research is conducted in police departments, it is usually police officers who are either the subjects of the research or are the ones who are expected to carry out the research procedures. 2. Basing police policy on research evidence is universally accepted as the most important consideration in policy-making. 3. COMPSTAT was introduced in Philadelphia in 1967 by Police Commissioner Frank Rizzo. 4. Because of the “accountability” aspect of COMPSTAT, some police officers may have an incentive to manipulate crime data to appear as though crime has been reduced. 5. Predictive policing is based on the fact that a majority of crime is not random.
The National Incident-Based Reporting System represents a significant redesign of the original Uniform Crime Reporting Program
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is usually NOT one of the criticisms of house arrest?
A. It is expensive for the county or state to operate. B. Domestic violence could result. C. Offenders can still commit crimes within their homes. D. It may not really feel like punishment to some offenders.