As described by Howard and Donnelly, Michael Walzer presents
a. a strong defense of the morality of the general international principle of nonintervention.
b. a strong argument that there can be no moral justification for remedial international action.
c. a strong defense of the morality of the general international principle of intervention for the sake of preventing human rights abuses.
d. an argument against any international intervention for the sake of human rights, even when there are gross violations of human rights.
e. a case for using morality as the chief reason for the violation of national sovereignty and that such a threshold for violation should be held relatively low to prevent undue suffering.
Answer: a
You might also like to view...
What role do debates play in modern campaigns?
A. They are especially important for independents and candidates from minor parties who may not have enough financial resources for television advertising. B. The debates provide an invaluable opportunity for frontrunners to work on developing their message. C. With the growth of television and Internet advertising, few voters watch debates so they are becoming increasingly rare. D. They rarely cover new ground but remain popular because they show presidential candidates up close under sustained pressure.
U.S. immigration policy was highly restrictive until the middle of the 19th Century
A. true B. false
How has the focus of pro-life interest groups changes in recent years?
What will be an ideal response?
What was the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy? Which presidential administration proffered this policy? What was the reaction to this policy? What is the current status of the policy?
What will be an ideal response?